The American Marxist State
The American Marxist State
Letter — To Enthusiastically Look Again AT DPRK and Kim Jong Un
Kevin A. Sensenig | April 28, 2017
------------------------------------------------------------
Background
------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first step on nxmvc to support DPRK and its government and society. It is a letter to my U.S. Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA), in support of United States efforts to recognize the depth and wisdom of the DPRK Marxist State.
Note that in the letter my theme is DPRK and that I mention Syria in separate context.
------------------------------------------------------------
Compute-Center Constitution
------------------------------------------------------------
In my read of the Constitution the past few weeks, I’ve realized that the Constitution is more in alignment with my idea of what a Marxist State would indicate, in terms of philosophy and society, by not only the Constitution’s theory and premise and so forth, but in its explicit structure and arrangement of Congress, the enumerateds, and the way it states things and uses its terms. It is concise and clarity. This only strengthens my idea of the US Constitution as a compute-center Constitution, from earlier[on nxmvc].
In the context of Marxism, later below, I mention Hegel’s Philosophy Of Right; and it’s clear to me that the compute-center Constitution is consistent both with Philosophy Of Right, and with Thomas Paine’s Common Sense (I have the Fall River Press edition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Letter I Wrote (To U.S. Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Policy And Some Thoughts On A Different Slant To Several Important And Current Matters
Senator Toomey
The office of Senator Toomey (PA)
Hey, let's be enthusiastic about something here. Let's find out about Kim Jung Un theory and praxis, the books he means to put into practice, and his day to day ideas. Let's find out about his economic model (and did his country suffer under the 2008 Global Recession, for instance?) and deep practice economic theory (social expression binding theory). He also obviously understands the military, and its refinement and ability to project -- and protect. Lesson to be learned.
President Donald J Trump also has a firm grasp of the proper use of the military, and its protective feature (as evidenced in the absolute best type of military action, the strike in Syria, especially in that it was against a military target, to a redefine effect…).
President Donald J Trump also has a solid base understanding of the economy, and it should be interesting to see the effect and strengthening features of that over time. More on the economy later.
I appreciate your concern for Syria, clearly expressed in your email letter just this morning (in response to a submission I'd made to you and your office, which I admit I'll have to return to later this afternoon), about Syria and it's dire situation (persistent through so many years).
Let me just saythat if the rebel armed rebels (in Syria) had _not_ picked up weapons, but had sought to strengthen and deepen the Assad government (and society) nothing would have happened and there would not be 400,000 civilians dead. There would not be Syrian refugees but a calm and deepening awareness society. Syria would be fully engaged with a dynamic situations in the international scene, in a dynamic world, fully present and aware, in a peacefully unfolding manner.
President Donald J Trump and his Administration and in society his supporters are deepening our awareness of a dynamic and 'to-notice' foreign policy, not just 'American interests' (although it is now in our own interest, this mutually interpenetrating awareness, subtle nuance, and deepening resolve, interconnected (philosophy and expression).
Thank you so much for your care and insight, and I welcome your letters so thoughtfully written.
Kevin A. Sensenig
nxmvc
New Holland PA
PA United States of America
Lancaster County PA
2017
04
25
Thank you again for your at-Liberty ideals, and sound principles of engagement. All The Best. -- Kevin S
Kevin Sensenig at 4/25/2017 3:48 PM
------------------------------------------------------------
Some Initial Pointers
------------------------------------------------------------
What are the source documents and ongoing literature in DPRK?
What are the source documents and words in print by Kim Jong Un, that he means to write and put into effect and/or study?
What is the economic model in DPRK?
What is the society at-Freedom to do things in DPRK? What are the responsibilities of DPRK citizens, to realize this at-Freedom ability to do things, and to support this idea?
I recommend absolute support for the deeply theoretical Marxist state DPRK and its 1) leadership 2) its people — as they are.
------------------------------------------------------------
Notes
------------------------------------------------------------
I have not looked into Communist Parties in the US. There may be differences of opinion on how things should be, and I’m stating what is simply my own view and interpretation of things.
For further reading I recommend The World Socialist Web Site (Marxist (and careful study and meticulous thinking are required)) and Z Magazine (subtype progressive) and Z Communications.
For further reading on our own hemisphere I recommend Americas Program.
I refer to The Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels, the Pathfinder edition, available on Barnes & Noble here. It’s likely also available at Amazon (www.amazon.com) and other fine stores. There are other versions of TCM. TCM provides historical criticism, careful analysis, and paragraphs that interlock.
I refer to Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right 1844.pdf. I obtained the document from www.marxists.org. A careful read is required. It is worth study. It is format literature. Like the Amendments, Marx starts out with religion as fundamental; and a careful grasp of its significance is required. Once you see what Marx is saying on the matter, things become clear about religion; but you have to understand religion and its significance, and various views on it. After that, various types of criticism become clear, in context.
I recommend Hegel’s The Philosophy Of Right by Alan White, or Philosophy Of Right by G. W. F. Hegel, Dover Philosophical Classics, available here.
------------------------------------------------------------